Ran across a great Wiki page with the history of NHL franchises.
Fact.
Only one NHL franchise in the last 30 years has moved without the team being sold within two years, either way, of that move — Minnesota North Stars
Fact.
Of the last four NHL teams to relocate, three of them were in markets the NHL never wanted in the first place – Quebec City, Hartford and Winnipeg. The moves of the three former WHA cities coincide with NHL owners getting their man in place for the Commissioner’s job. Gary Bettman started in February, 1993. Coincidence or orchestrated move? Considering how the NHL Board of Governors has reacted to Jim Balsillie and the Phoenix Coyotes, it makes you wonder.
From what can we draw about these facts?
1.) In the last 30 years, NHL franchises haven’t relocated cities unless the team is sold.
2.) The NHL is now in markets IT WANTS TO BE IN rather than markets it was forced to be in.
How does this relate to KC?
1.) If you ever hear anyone say that a current NHL franchise owner may be interested in keeping his franchise and just moving cities, you can safely draw the conclusion that this is pure speculation and has no basis in fact. The precedent in the NHL is set.
2.) Unless your market was a former WHA market, then you can feel comfortable your NHL team will be around for awhile. You absolutely cannot discount this in any way. It is absolutely key to this whole “Kansas City may get an NHL franchise” spin. Bettman has the 30 markets HE orchestrated. He will not waiver from proving they were all a good choice.
3.) If an NHL team is sold, KC can stay tuned for two years. If the owner hasn’t made a move in those first two years, then he isn’t going to make a move.
Here is the link for you to do your own research
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_organizational_changes_in_the_NHL
(yes, I know Wiki isn’t a bastion of accurate information, but this page does have all the facts/timelines correct)





